Thomas' Plant-Related Blog

On plant science. Mostly.

Herbicide resistant weeds in a GM field

with 9 comments

ResearchBlogging.orgNot the way that you might think or fear, though.

Genetically modified crops face public resentment, especially in Europe, perhaps simply as a figurehead of big corporate agriculture. One concern that often comes up is the possibility that the foreign genes will escape, to non-GM crops nearby or to weed populations. It’s not as unlikely as it might sound: even quite distantly related plants will very occasionally interbreed, so some genes can swap between species.

Since some of the most important GM crops are herbicide resistant (so farmers can use powerful weedkillers that would normally kill the crop), the spectre of herbicide-resistant ‘superweeds’ is invoked. So when herbicide resistant amaranth appeared in fields of GM cotton in the US, it must have been worrying.

Palmer's amaranth

Palmer's amaranth, also pleasingly called 'carelessweed'. Image by pompilid (Wikipedia)

As it turns out, the amaranth isn’t using the gene that was engineered into the cotton. They developed their own resistance, a textbook example of evolution by natural selection (if artificial herbicides could be called natural). Of course, that doesn’t make the weed any less of a problem, but it does mean that GM isn’t directly to blame.

The herbicide in question goes by the chemical name glyphosate, while Monsanto sell it under the brand name Roundup (hence the Roundup Ready series of resistant, GM crops). It works by blocking an enzyme called EPSPS. What EPSPS does isn’t important to the discussion, but it is important to the plant. With that enzyme out of action, a key part of their metabolism is blocked, and they die.

Roundup Ready GM crops are given a different form of EPSPS which isn’t affected by glyphosate. But the amaranth hasn’t got that gene, and it hasn’t independently evolved a resistant EPSPS gene, either. It’s used a rather more interesting strategy, a kind of brute force approach.

The amaranth simply produces a lot of the enzyme, and swamps the herbicide. And it’s achieved that by copying the gene for the enzyme, anywhere from five to 160 times, splashing it around its chromosomes. Like photocopying a recipe and giving it to dozens of people, that’s a simple but effective way to get more enzyme (or cake) made. One of the plants they bred in the lab had the enzyme processing 20 times faster than normal.

That’s interesting in its own right as a simple evolutionary case study, but it’s got other implications. Copying genes is a key part of evolution, because you get ‘spares’. The plant with 160 copies of the EPSPS gene could likely survive with 159 of them, leaving one free to evolve into… who knows? An enzyme producing doing something different in a small but significant way, perhaps. And does this massive duplication of genes happen by chance from time to time, or was it somehow caused by the stress of herbicide applications? What would happen to all those extra genes if we stopped using glyphosate?

Finally, I said that GM isn’t directly to blame. You could make a case that it’s indirectly responsible, because it allows the widespread use of a single herbicide, which creates a strong selection pressure on weeds. But, even if they sound evil, powerful herbicides are economically useful (so long as they don’t kill the crop, of course). The herbicide resistant weeds don’t make it any harder for farmers, they just cancel out the benefit of using the herbicide in the first place. In the end, we find ourselves in an arms race against natural selection, which has already equipped amaranth with resistance to several other herbicides. So far, we seem to be keeping up.

Reference:

Gaines, T., Zhang, W., Wang, D., Bukun, B., Chisholm, S., Shaner, D., Nissen, S., Patzoldt, W., Tranel, P., Culpepper, A., Grey, T., Webster, T., Vencill, W., Sammons, R., Jiang, J., Preston, C., Leach, J., & Westra, P. (2009). Gene amplification confers glyphosate resistance in Amaranthus palmeri Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107 (3), 1029-1034 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0906649107

Advertisements

Written by Thomas Kluyver

26 January, 2010 at 10:29 pm

Posted in Papers

Tagged with , ,

9 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. But we eat amaranth too, no? At least, my breakfast cereal contains the stuff, and the blurb on the back seems to think that it’s God’s gift to human tastebuds and longevity. So can’t they just put legs on the herbicide-resistant amaranth (Using one of the spare genes, perhaps. Or maybe I’m not being entirely literal.) and make it wonder across to go and be useful in the amaranth field? Or at least use the resistant kind to make a hybrid with the edible kind?

    The Giant ragweed however sounds terrifying.

    SB

    27 January, 2010 at 10:47 am

    • We do indeed, but not the same species. The weed in this work is Palmer’s amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri). According to Wikipedia, there are several species of amaranth we use as grains, but not Palmer’s amaranth. In fact, quinoa is also an amaranth (it’s Amaranthus quinoa!). You’re right, though, it’s probably possible to breed it back into the one we eat (a quick search turns up this paper). Whether there’s demand for ’roundup ready’ style amaranth, I don’t know enough about farming to say.

      I’m a bit confused about the giant ragweed. Is that in your breakfast cereal too? It is apparently edible, by this, admittedly unscientific, report, but I can’t easily find reports of it being used as food.

      Thomas Kluyver

      27 January, 2010 at 2:48 pm

      • No, I have never heard of ragweed being eaten before. I’m just used to the kind that makes cows’ milk go bad so adding “giant” and “resistant” sounds like a story that Wyndham would be proud of! Problems in the cheese supply would be a major threat to society! I suspect though, that the giant stuff and the nasty stuff are different things.

        SB

        27 January, 2010 at 4:44 pm

      • They’re closely related: the giant one is Artemisia trifida, and common ragweed is Ambrosia artemisiifolia.

        Wait a minute, I’ve worked out why we’re confused (I was thinking the same thing until I tried some searches just now). The poisonous one is ragwort, not ragweed. Jacobaea vulgaris is poisonous to mammals. Ragweed isn’t particularly, although it can trigger hayfever. Ragwort (the poisonous one) is native to Europe and invasive in North America (and other places). Ragweed is an American species which has been introduced over here. They’re both in the sunflower/daisy family (Asteraceae). We learn something every day!

        I’m still puzzled about where you got giant ragweed from, though. I can’t see that I mentioned it! :-S

        Thomas Kluyver

        27 January, 2010 at 5:39 pm

  2. […] This post was mentioned on Twitter by ResearchBlogging.org, Moleculen&Materialen. Moleculen&Materialen said: Onkruid wordt op eigen kracht resistent in veld met genetisch gemodificeerd gewas http://goo.gl/fb/dxsU (Engels) […]

  3. Yes indeed, my mistake. There does also seem to be some debate about whether ragwort’s actually poisonous in quantities which a cow might realistically eat. I’ve certainly always believed that it is, but DEFRA don’t seem so sure any longer. It does, however, still make milk taste bad, so some of my childhood learning still stands.

    I have a list of automatically generated “possibly related posts” at the end of the article, including one about giant resistant ragweed.

    SB

    27 January, 2010 at 7:05 pm

    • Ah, I see. I’d missed the ‘possibly related posts’.

      Thomas Kluyver

      27 January, 2010 at 7:09 pm

      • Yes. I think they’re the sort of thing that well-adjusted, efficient twenty-first century brain skip over!

        SB

        27 January, 2010 at 7:11 pm

  4. […] the environment. However, heavy application of herbicide in fields of GM herbicide resistant crops can exert such a strong selective pressure on weeds that they become herbicide resistant, too. Ah, unintended […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: